Water

Murrumbidgee River. Source: Ryan Colley

This section provides an assessment of aquatic ecosystems and water quality in the ACT.

Key findings

The main pressures on aquatic ecosystem condition in the ACT are land use impacts, modified river flows, and climate change

48% of assessed river reaches have poor to degraded riparian condition

Native species typically account for less than 30% of fish abundance in the Murrumbidgee River

Recreational water quality is poor for both lakes and rivers with closures at many sites due to enterococci and blue-green algae

Background

Healthy aquatic ecosystems are essential to the ACT’s biodiversity, urban community, and agriculture. Aquatic ecosystems, and their riparian and floodplain lands, provide many environmental benefits and are habitat for both aquatic and terrestrial species. They provide ecosystem services such as the supply of water resources, water purification and nutrient cycling, and are important places for culture, recreation and social interaction.

Threatened aquatic biodiversity is discussed in the Biodiversity section. Water resources and consumption are discussed in Indicator HS5: Water resources and Indicator HS6: Water consumption.

Assessments of the ACT’s groundwater systems are not included in this report. Groundwater is a minor component of total water use in the ACT, and typically restricted to non-potable supply. There is also a lack of comprehensive data on groundwater resources and quality data in the ACT making difficult to assess their condition. The ACT’s State of the Environment 2015 report concluded that groundwater availability and quality were likely to be good in the ACT.Office of the Commissioner for Sustainability and the Environment, 2015, ACT State of the Environment Report 2015, ACT Government, Canberra. It was also concluded that the volume of groundwater extraction was far less than the recharge volume for aquifers.

Aquatic ecosystems in the ACT

The main rivers in the ACT region are shown in Figure W1, these are:

Figure W1: Catchments and main rivers in the ACT region 

Source: Bureau of Meteorology

Canberra has three constructed lakes – Lake Burley Griffin, Lake Ginninderra and Lake Tuggeranong – and numerous constructed ponds and wetlands. These lakes provide habitat for biodiversity, water pollution control, improve aesthetics and heat mitigation, and are sites for a range of recreational opportunities.

The ACT also has the Ramsar-listed Ginini Flats Wetland Complex in the Namadgi National Park, and 12 nationally important wetlands listed in the Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia (Figure W2).Environment Australia, 2001, A Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia, Third edition, Australian Government, Canberra, found at www.environment.gov.au/resource/directory-important-wetlands-australia, accessed August 2019. High Country Bogs and Associated Fens was added to the endangered category of the ACT Threatened Ecological Communities List in February 2019.

Figure W2: Significant wetlands in the Canberra region

Source: Bureau of Meteorology

Pressures on aquatic ecosystems

There are many pressures on the ACT’s aquatic ecosystems including changes in land use types, degradation of water quality, loss of riparian and other catchment vegetation, the alteration of natural flow regimes, modified river channels, streamflow diversion, fire, introduced species, and recreational fishing. Many of these pressures are rarely localised, with impacts usually affecting downstream ecosystem health. In the case of significant impacts, river degradation can be extensive. For example, the impacts of storage dams and their associated flow alteration on rivers can occur over extensive distances (see Case study: Impact of the Snowy Mountains Scheme on the Murrumbidgee River). This means that for those river systems that originate in NSW (Murrumbidgee and Molonglo Rivers), their condition within the ACT is highly influenced by upstream catchment conditions and management.

The main pressures on aquatic ecosystems are discussed below.

There are many pressures on the ACT’s aquatic ecosystems including changes in land use types, degradation of water quality, loss of riparian and other catchment vegetation, the alteration of natural flow regimes, modified river channels, streamflow diversion, fire, introduced species, and recreational fishing.

Land use and habitat loss

The clearance of vegetation and degradation of soils associated with modified landscapes such as urban and agricultural areas can significantly impact aquatic ecosystem health. Modified landscapes increase the pollutant and sediment loads entering waterways and alter hydrology through changes to natural drainage and river channels. The construction of large impervious surfaces in urban areas also increases surface run-off which can pollute waterways with fertilisers and other chemicals, organic matter, salts, soil, oil and sewage effluent.

The clearance and degradation of riparian zones has resulted in the loss of crucial habitat (including instream woody debris and terrestrial habitat) and functions such as shading, channel protection and food resources. Riparian condition has also been affected by loss of connectivity and the introduction of exotic species such as willow trees (see riparian connectivity in Indicator B4: Extent and condition of native vegetation

Agricultural production can also have significant impacts on aquatic ecosystems. For example, native vegetation clearance for cropping and grazing has led to increased soil erosion and the potential for chemicals and animal waste to enter waterways. These compromise water quality through sedimentation, elevated nutrients, and the introduction of potentially toxic chemicals. Forestry activities can also impact on aquatic ecosystems, particularly through erosion and increased run-off following harvesting operations and the introduction of roads.

River flows

Water reservoirs and weirs cause significant alteration to the timing and volume of natural flow regimes and are barriers to the movement of fish and other species. Changes to natural flows are particularly detrimental for species with life-cycle stages that are intimately linked to seasonal flow changes. In addition to flow alteration, reservoirs can cause thermal pollution through the release of cold water which can impact on biodiversity. Other impacts on river flows include channel modifications to prevent the duration and frequency of flooding. Any alteration to river flows can change the natural morphology of rivers. 

The impacts of modified flow regimes are compounded by the occurrence of drought. Extended periods of reduced flows can lead to increased water temperatures (especially where riparian vegetation has been cleared), degraded water quality and increased risk of algal blooms. These have negative consequences for biodiversity and agriculture (stock animals). Extended dry conditions can also result in habitat loss and depleted biodiversity on the edges of water systems.

Fire

Bushfires remove vegetation cover, exposing and altering the structure of soils and increasing the risk of significant erosion. Consequently, rainfall and run-off after bushfires can deposit large volumes of sediment and ash into aquatic ecosystems. These deposits degrade water quality by increasing turbidity and nutrient concentrations, and can reduce dissolved oxygen concentrations causing the loss of fish and macroinvertebrates. Large amounts of sediment and ash can also smother instream habitat. 

Severe fires can also result in the loss of riparian vegetation and the habitat, shading and food resources that this vegetation provides. 

In addition to biodiversity impacts, fires that occur in drinking-water catchments can have consequences for domestic water supply. These include increased water treatment costs and reductions in water yields due to increased uptake by regenerating vegetation.

Climate change

Climate change exacerbates existing pressures on aquatic ecosystems. Reduced rainfall (including snowfall), hotter temperatures and increased evapotranspiration (see Climate change section) all have severe consequences, including:

Although the aquatic species of the ACT are well-adapted to extremes of floods and droughts, these events are projected to intensify under climate change, pushing some species and communities beyond their ability to adapt. In the long term, the pressures of climate change on freshwater ecosystems could lead to significant and long-lasting changes in the species present in rivers, lakes and wetlands in the ACT.

Key actions

That the ACT Government:

Lake Burley Griffin. Source: Ryan Colley
Lake Burley Griffin. Source: Ryan Colley
Action 1

identify opportunities to develop water-sensitive urban design measures to reduce the impact of urban land use on aquatic ecosystems.

Action 2

re-establish riparian vegetation in both urban and rural areas to improve habitat and protect lakes and waterways from pollutant run-off.

Action 3

establish a government reporting framework for the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health. This should include the selection of key monitoring sites that provide comprehensive coverage of land use types, sub-catchments and ecosystems across the ACT; incorporate work undertaken for the Catchment Health Indicator Program; incorporate all relevant condition parameters; and produce public reports at appropriate intervals to provide meaningful assessments.

Action 4

produce an annual recreational water quality report that includes monitoring results, investigations into the main sources of pollutants, recommended actions to improve water quality; and assessments of management effectiveness.

Action 5

increase fish-stocking programs to maintain fish populations in Canberra’s lakes and ponds.

Action 6

identify opportunities to collaborate with the NSW Government on management activities to improve aquatic ecosystem health upstream and downstream of the ACT, including the management of native and alien fish, re-establishing riparian zones and reducing catchment erosion.

Action 7

seek to increase water releases to the upper Murrumbidgee River under the Snowy 2.0 project to improve aquatic ecosystem health in the Murrumbidgee River.

See all actions →

Indicator dashboards

W1: Aquatic ecosystem health

Aquatic ecosystem health is variable across the ACT and strongly influenced by land use. Aquatic health is mostly good in conservation areas, but condition is poorer in urban and rural areas. The impact of land use is particularly evident for assessments of macroinvertebrate and riparian condition. Dry conditions in the region are also having an impact on aquatic health. Alien fish populations are high for the Murrumbidgee River with native fish accounting for less than 30% of fish abundance and 20% of biomass.

Condition & trend
  • ? Poor
  • ? Fair
  • ? Good
Data quality
High
W2: River flows

All river flows were well below the long-term average in 2017 and 2018. A continuation of these conditions will have consequences for the ecosystem health and amenity of rivers in the ACT. All discharges downstream of storage reservoirs met the environmental flow requirement; this took place despite the significantly reduced rainfall and river flows in 2017 and 2018.

Condition & trend
  • Trending arrow Poor
  • Trending arrow Fair
  • Trending arrow Good
Data quality
High
W3: Water quality

Water quality was generally good for the reporting period, including for sites in urban and rural areas. Water quality results may reflect the decreased rainfall for most of the reporting period. However, turbidity remains an issue following high rainfall events. Water quality in the Murrumbidgee River is comparable upstream and downstream of the ACT indicating minimal water quality impacts in the region.

Condition & trend
  • Trending arrow Poor
  • Trending arrow Fair
  • Trending arrow Good
Data quality
High
W4: Recreational water quality

Recreation water quality is poor in the ACT for both lakes and rivers. Nearly every monitored recreation site experienced closures due to the exceedance of enterococci guidelines, and blue-green algae has required extended closures in Canberra’s lakes. Lake Tuggeranong was closed for most of the 2018–19 recreational swim season due to poor recreational water quality.

Condition & trend
  • Trending arrow Poor
  • Trending arrow Fair
  • Trending arrow Good
Data quality
High
Indicator assessment legend
Condition
  • Poor
  • Fair
  • Good

Environmental condition is healthy across the ACT, OR pressure likely to have negligible impact on environmental condition/human health.

  • Poor
  • Fair
  • Good

Environmental condition is neither positive or negative and may be variable across the ACT, OR pressure likely to have limited impact on environmental condition/human health.

  • Poor
  • Fair
  • Good

Environmental condition is under significant stress, OR pressure likely to have significant impact on environmental condition/ human health.

  • Poor
  • Unknown
  • Good

Data is insufficient to make an assessment of status and trends.

Trend
Trending arrow

Improving

Trending arrow

Deteriorating

Stable

?

Unclear

Data quality
High

Adequate high-quality evidence and high level of consensus

Moderate

Limited evidence or limited consensus

Low

Evidence and consensus too low to make an assessment

N/A

Assessments of status, trends and data quality are not appropriate for the indicator

Explore all findings ↓

Data summaries

Aquatic ecosystem health 2015 to 2018

The main pressures on aquatic ecosystem condition in the ACT are land use impacts, modified river flows, and climate change.

This is the first ACT State of the Environment report to use data from the Catchment Health Indicator Program (CHIP). The program assessed 67 reaches in the Ginninderra, Molonglo and Southern ACT catchments.
38 (57%) reaches were in fair condition across the 3 catchments, 26 (39%) were in good condition. Only 2 reaches were found to be in excellent condition and 1 was assessed as poor.
Aquatic condition is strongly influenced by land use with reaches in urban and rural areas in poorer health than those in conservation and protected lands.
The Southern ACT catchment had the highest proportion of reaches in good to excellent condition with 15 out of the 26 reaches assessed.
The presence of some good condition reaches in urban areas shows that healthy aquatic ecosystems can be supported with effective management and water-sensitive urban design.
Macroinvertebrate condition 2015 to 2018

Only 25% of reaches assessed were found to have good to excellent macroinvertebrate condition, 26% were found to be in poor to degraded condition, with 49% classed as fair.

The Southern ACT and Molonglo catchments had the most reaches with healthy macroinvertebrate communities.
Macroinvertebrate condition was strongly linked to land use but also likely influenced by the mostly dry conditions over the assessment period.
Riparian condition

Only 14% of reaches were assessed as having good to excellent riparian condition, 37% were found to be in fair condition and 48% were assessed as poor to degraded.

Urban and rural areas generally had fair to degraded riparian condition due to vegetation clearing. However, there were also some fair and poor reaches in conservation and protected areas.
The replanting of native species in cleared riparian zones and the removal of weed species would greatly improve aquatic health and the amenity of aquatic ecosystems for the ACT community.
Native fish

There are positive trends for some populations of native fish including the Two Spined Blackfish and Macquarie Perch in the Cotter River, and Murray Cod in some sections of the Murrumbidgee River.

Negative native fish population trends include a decline of Trout Cod following the cessation of conservation stocking by the NSW Government in the Upper Murrumbidgee Catchment, and low populations of Golden Perch in the upper reaches of the Murrumbidgee River.

Alien fish species are common in the ACT, with native fish typically accounting for less than 30% of total fish abundance and less than 20% of total fish biomass in the Murrumbidgee River. The dominance of alien species in the Murrumbidgee River is mainly due to high numbers
of carp.

The proportion of native fish abundance is higher in the Cotter River, accounting for over 70% of the total abundance and between 45% and 70% of the total biomass between 2014 and 2019.
Alien fish species are having an impact on native fish in the ACT, competing for food and habitat resources, spreading disease and modifying habitat.
Between 2015 and 2019, over 162,000 Golden Perch and 107,000 Murray Cod were stocked in Canberra’s lakes and larger ponds.
The presence of Murray Cod and Golden Perch in Canberra’s urban lakes and ponds is dependent on stocking.
River flows 2015 to 2018
For the Murrumbidgee and Molonglo rivers, annual discharges were well below the long-term average in 2017 and 2018. These years followed two consecutive years of annual discharges higher than long-term average flows (2015 and 2016).
Discharges for the Cotter River and Paddys River also had annual discharges that were well below the long-term average in 2017 and 2018 with only 2016 above the long-term average.
Annual discharges were lowest in 2018 due to the lack of rainfall: the annual discharge in Paddys River was just 7% of the long-term average; the Molonglo River 15%; Murrumbidgee at Lobbs Hole 17%; Murrumbidgee at Halls Crossing 19%; and Cotter River 24%.
These reduced discharges have consequences for ecosystem health as well as the amenity of the ACT’s waterways.
Annual discharges for the Murrumbidgee River leaving the ACT were much higher than those upstream of the region. The ACT’s additions to Murrumbidgee River flows are vital for downstream ecosystem health and water supply, particularly during low flow periods.
All discharges downstream of storage reservoirs met the environmental flow requirement; this took place despite the significantly reduced rainfall and river flows in 2017 and 2018.
Water Quality 2015 to 2018
Water quality guidelines were met for nearly all monitoring samples taken in the Murrumbidgee River for pH, electrical conductivity and dissolved oxygen.
Turbidity guideline exceedances were for high for the Murrumbidgee River for the years 2015 to 2017. Exceedances in 2018 were lower than other years and are likely related to reduced rainfall and catchment run-off.
Except for nitrogen, water quality in the Murrumbidgee River is comparable upstream and downstream of the ACT, with turbidity slightly improving as the river moves though the region.
For assessments undertaken as part of the CHIP, water quality was found to be excellent for 35% of reaches and good for 62%, with only 2 reaches assessed as fair condition.
All catchments had the majority of their reaches in good to excellent condition for water quality. The Southern ACT catchment had 62% of reaches in excellent condition.
Although the ACT’s water quality was generally good, nitrogen concentrations are much higher in the Murrumbidgee River downstream of the Lower Molonglo Water Quality Control Centre.
Water quality condition is linked to land use with the majority of reaches in excellent condition on conservation and protected land.
Despite the added pressures imposed by urban and rural land uses, water quality was still good in these areas, with some reaches attaining excellent condition ratings. This assessment demonstrates the effectiveness of water quality management in some urban areas, particularly as a result of constructed wetlands and other water-sensitive design approaches.
Water quality results may also reflect the decreased rainfall for most of the reporting period. Dry conditions decreased the amount of pollutants entering waterways from rainfall run-off.
Recreational water quality 2016–17 to 2018–19

Nearly every monitored recreation site experienced closures due to the exceedance of enterococci (faecal coliform bacteria) guidelines.

When compared to the other urban lakes, Lake Ginninderra is the only lake where enterococci is the main cause of recreation closures and had the highest number of closures due to enterococci each year.
Murrumbidgee River had a high number of site closures for enterococci.
Enterococci results for Paddys River are a concern with substantial periods of closure for the single site monitored.
Blue-green algae is the main cause of recreation closures for Lake Tuggeranong and Lake Burley Griffin.
Lake Tuggeranong had the highest number of blue-green algae closures in 2016–17 and 2018–19 and was closed for most of the 2018–19 recreational swim season.
The Molonglo River was the only river to have recreation closures due to blue-green algae.
To reduce the number and duration of recreational closures, there needs to be improved management and interception of run-off in urban areas, and the re-establishment of riparian vegetation in both urban and rural areas.

Indicators